
Originally Posted by
nukecad
OOh,some big subjects there.
Heres a few of my thoughts.
Some years ago, as a society, we started on a daring social experiment.
Disciplining our children was no longer the way, we were supposed to reason with them instead.
(Reason with a tantrum throwing child, must have been made up by someone who has never even seen a child).
Children cannot be reasoned with, they are children with short attention spans and developing social skills.
Children are all about me, me, me, until they learn differently.
This learning involves setting boundries, and discipline if the boundries are crossed.
Social workers, school teachers, and nursery workers were at the forefront of this experiment and parents had to fall in line or somehow they were 'bad' parents.
So what are the results of this experiment so far?
We now have a generation of young adults who have never been taught self discipline.
Because they have rarely, if ever, been disciplined or punished they have learnt that most of the time they can get away with ignoring the rules of society.
Ask any police officer, or ambulance crew, or fire crew.
And even worse than that- they are correct.
Unless members of society police themselves we do not have a large enough police force to enforce the law, we never have had.
Take the riots of a few years ago; ostensibly a protest over a race issue it was nothing of the sort.
Certain young adults and teenagers saw that there was no-one able to stop them so they just looted anything that took their fancy, after setting a few fires to keep 'the authorities' busy.
They have learned that if the break the law in sufficent numbers then the police are powerless to stop them.
I have no doubt that this will happen again in a few years.
Oh, and don't forget that the first subjects of this social experiment are now parents themselves.
What chance do their kids have of becoming responsible members of society?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
As for whether someone is mature at age 16; of course not but try telling them that.
I thought I was, as I'm sure most of us did.
This one however is not a new problem, it's always been an issue as to just when someone is considered 'old enough' to make their own way in the world.
Take the age of sexual consent, this was set at 16 years old in 1885 and remains so today.
Before that it was 12, for a female, until 1875 when it was raised to 13.
(There does not seem to have been a minimum age for males that I can find).
Just some of the current confusion:
You can have a part time job at 14+, but have to be 16 for a full time job.
And you have to attend school until the last Friday in June of your 16th year.
You can buy a soft drink in a bar at 14, but not alcohol until 18.
You can legally have sex at 16.
You can drive a car at 17 if you pass your test.
You can't vote until you are 18, or place a bet in a betting shop. (But you can buy a lottery ticket at 16).
You need to be 21 to drive a bus, or a lorry over 7.5 tonnes, or a road roller.
At 21 you are entitled to the full rate of the national minimum wage;
But if you are claiming (most) benefits you don't get the full 'adult' rate until you are 25.
Is it any wonder that people get confused about when they are considered to be an adult.