
Originally Posted by
nukecad
I got thinking about this when looking at a question of whether an ESA payment amount was correct.
I'm a bit conflicted here.
To declare where I am coming from, for those who don't know my particular circumstances.
I get ESA WRAG (IR) - £102.15/week. (and £60/week LHA for my rent paid direct to my landlord).
I have not been able to work for the last 5 years, but always worked full time before that.
I'll leave it at that for now, you can find stuff in my earlier posts or if needed I can expand on my medical history.
So to get to the topic:
If I was entitled to SG and/or any of the disability premiums it would make things financialy easier.
But there again my health would have to be worse to qualify for SG (and maybe PIP).
I know that I'm probably not phrasing this right but it seems to come down to:
Would I rather be more able and have less money in benefits?
Or would I rather be less able and have more money in benefits?
And yes, I would much prefer to be able to work and not have to rely on benefits at all.
(So that answers my own question, lol, I said I wasn't phrasing it right).
Tricky one as I myself seem to be on the borderline.
Sometimes I think I should be able to get back to work, and then the week after I know that this is not going to happen anytime soon.
So what are your thoughts?
And please no political rants here, lets keep it to practical issues.